Re: HMR-161 Korea Pics Anything associated with HMR-161 and any HMR unit flying the Sikorsky HRS helicopter is of great interest to me. I host a ...
Re: Helicopter Accidents Hanshin and Oppama, Japan pm3777;34223 wrote: Can you bring up the crew & passengers etc ?? I was there but memory only...
Re: Helicopter Accidents Hanshin and Oppama, Japan Great work as usual, Sid. I show BuNo130206 assigned to MAMRON 11 being SOC (destroyed) o...
Re: Helicopter Accidents Hanshin and Oppama, Japan This one occured March 25, 1953 and may be the one you're referring to: br /> Date of...
Re: Helicopter Accidents Hanshin and Oppama, Japan HMR-162 deployed from Santa Ana to Oppama in March 1954. One year later, they replaced HMR-161...
Re: Korean War Ernie mentioned SAR helicopters at K-6 and the only photo from my site which came to mind is this one of 127797 when it was assign...
Re: looking for history on Cherry Point AES-46/SOES/VMR-1 Jack Ubel;31415 wrote: Was trying to get in touch with Craig 59 at hrs- helicopters. I ...
Re: looking for history on Cherry Point AES-46/SOES/VMR-1 SSgt Croley, Sorry for being very slow on the uptake here. Below is a link to a ph...
I emailed the aircraft curator at the National Museum of the Marine Corps and told him of them. I don't know if they have one in storage but, if they ...
Don't know if they were there at the same time but, does he remember a pilot named Don Foss? If so, I can try to put him in touch with Don.
Associating tail numbers with particular Bureau Numbers is something I've been trying to do for the Sikorsky HRS at my site, www.hrs-helicopter.com. M...
Art, HR-7 was Bureau Number 127790 and there's a good picture of it here on my website, www.hrs-helicopter.com. A great online history of HM...
Joe Baugher's site shows this as a Sikorsky R-5F Dragonfly, not an H03S. His site also indicates that 47-482 and 47-486 were both in Korea with the 3r...
Tim, Again, thanks for the pictures. For Everyone, The site has been updated as of a few days ago. Work has kept me hopping of late but...